Archive for April, 2009

Give and Take: Uniting to Fight Poverty

Why don’t domestic charities fighting poverty do more to collaborate with international charities that also seek to help the poor? That is the question posted in a new item in Give and Take, The Chronicle’s roundup of the best blog posts about the nonprofit world.

Plus: Should small charities seek money available under the new federal economic-stimulus plan?

Conference Notebook: Online Fund Raising in Hard Times

An Internet fund-raising expert discussed how nonprofit groups are raising money online in the recession, part of The Chronicle’s continuing coverage of the Nonprofit Technology Conference.

Most Powerful Statements: Cass Wheeler

Yesterday was the first part of this month’s Featured Fundraiser Cass Wheeler.  Here is part two of that post.

What is the most frustrating or difficult thing about fund development?

Being a good fund raiser requires a sales and a management mentality. Every call on a donor is a sales call. Recruiting volunteers requires a sales mentality as well. What appeals do you use to get the results you want? In most instances, staff are also guiding and managing a group of volunteers toward to defined goal so leadership and management skills are also critical. Maintaining a positive “can do attitude” is critical because you often experience many “no’s” before you get to the “yes’s” but you can’t let it get you down and you have to be a role model for the volunteers you work with. You also have to have a thick skin and you have to be assertive. Don ‘t assume that someone either won’t give or won’t give at a certain level. You cannot be in the business of making decisions for other people. Only they can do that.

What are one or two of the most powerful statements you’ve ever made?

I’ll give you two not necessarily in order of importance. First is “What would it take to do x, y or z?” This question re-frames an issue. I remember years ago when our Walk was raising $12 million, I asked the question of our Walk Team: “What would it take to raise $30 million?” At first the responses were all the reasons it couldn’t be done. I told them that I knew it wasn’t impossible and that there must be some way and asked that with no constraints they go back a develop a plan. The team not only came back with a plan but with a slogan—30 in 30. $30 million in 30 months. And it was accomplished in 18 months. As we neared that achievement my next questions was “What would it take to raise $100 million and that was accomplished before I stepped down as CEO.

The second question is to drive candor in your organization. The statement is “Here is what I think and here is how I arrived at that conclusion, please tell me what I’m not seeing or understanding?” This is an empowering statement. You aren’t playing games, you are stating what you think. You are also telling everyone why you think that so they understand your thought processes. But you are also inviting other points of view and encouraging more discussion and not ending discussion. This is particularly important for leaders. These kind of statements will not only improve the quality of your decision making it will increase the organizational commitment to whatever the final decision is because everyone will have had an opportunity to express their views.


Interns, enterns and the ripple effect

Design Tweaks Vote

Comps for the header/nav design tweaks are in, and the results are mixed. Some people just moved a few things around, while others proposed a new style altogether. We won’t make any major changes to style in 2.8, but if the vote leans toward a submission that proposes it, we’ll do some user testing and make a decision for early 2.9 (which, now that we think of it, is probably the right thing to do anyway. :) )

Below are the links to the screenshots that were submitted. Please review each one (I’d open them all in tabs so I could look back and forth while they are all large size, because the voting poll just uses thumbnails), then choose the one you think looks the best/is the most usable.

This poll was supposed to close at 8pm NY time on Tuesday (today), but we’re going to leave it open for an extra day. The voting poll will now be closed at 8pm NY time on Wednesday (that’s 2am Thursday, UTC). If you want to discuss the entries’ pros/cons, this thread would be a good place.

Current: The existing interface, for reference

KM: Current nav, header elements moved

AN: Current nav, file folder style header

KD: Current nav, modified header style

JJ: Swap blog title and favorites menu

DR1: Fluency style, dark

DR2: Fluency style, medium

DR3: Fluency style, light

IK: Nav layered over dark background

MT: Modified nav and header

Results will be posted the day after the polls close.

Design Tweaks Vote

Comps for the header/nav design tweaks are in, and the results are mixed. Some people just moved a few things around, while others proposed a new style altogether. We won’t make any major changes to style in 2.8, but if the vote leans toward a submission that proposes it, we’ll do some user testing and make a decision for early 2.9 (which, now that we think of it, is probably the right thing to do anyway. :) )

Below are the links to the screenshots that were submitted. Please review each one (I’d open them all in tabs so I could look back and forth while they are all large size, because the voting poll just uses thumbnails), then choose the one you think looks the best/is the most usable.

This poll was supposed to close at 8pm NY time on Tuesday (today), but we’re going to leave it open for an extra day. The voting poll will now be closed at 8pm NY time on Wednesday (that’s 2am Thursday, UTC). If you want to discuss the entries’ pros/cons, this thread would be a good place.

Current: The existing interface, for reference

KM: Current nav, header elements moved

AN: Current nav, file folder style header

KD: Current nav, modified header style

JJ: Swap blog title and favorites menu

DR1: Fluency style, dark

DR2: Fluency style, medium

DR3: Fluency style, light

IK: Nav layered over dark background

GB: Modified nav/header intersection

MT: Modified nav and header

Results will be posted the day after the polls close.

Churches That Defied Politicking Ban Await IRS Action

The Internal Revenue Service has yet to take action against 33 churches that defied a prohibition on houses of worship endorsing political candidates during last year’s presidential election, the Associated Press reports.

“Pulpit Freedom Sunday,” which was held on September 28, was designed to start a court fight in hopes of overturning the ban. Under IRS rules, places of worship can issue voter guides, hold forums, and engage in other nonpartisan political activity but cannot endorse candidates, at the risk of losing their tax-exempt status.

The Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal group that organized the event, said the IRS has yet to notify the churches of any investigation. An IRS spokesman declined to comment.

See an article from The Chronicle’s archive about the alliance’s protest.

(A paid subscription or temporary pass is required to view the Chronicle article.)

Conservationists Craft Wish Lists for Proposed Increase in Federal Aid

A proposal pending in Congress would increase the amount available for the federal government to buy land for national parks, forests, and wildlife refuges — so conservation groups have begun to draw up wish lists for expanded green spaces, reports the Los Angeles Times.

Environmentalists are arguing that an economic downturn is the time to step up preservation efforts. “Property values are not today what they were a year ago. So every dollar invested … buys a little bit more habitat, a little bit more recreational trail, a little bit more scenic vista,” said Alan Front, a senior vice president of the Trust for Public Land.

President Obama’s budget proposes to spend $420-million next year on such purchases, more than double what Congress approved for 2009, and he has called for an increase in the annual amount spent to $900-million within five years.

(Free registration is required to view this article.)

Charity’s Mortgage Program Helps Those Who Lost Jobs

The Rainy Day Foundation, a previously obscure financial-counseling charity, is doing a booming business in its program to provide job-loss insurance to mortgage holders, the San Francisco Chronicle reports.

Offered through about 100 builders and lenders nationwide, the Rainy Day Foundation’s coverage can provide people who buy homes up to six months of mortgage payments if they lose their job within two years after they buy a house.

Rick Del Sontro, the foundation’s chief executive, estimated that because of layoffs nationwide, the organization will pay out $8-million to homeowners in 2009, up from $4-million last year.

Olympian’s Charity Helps Older People Achieve Out-of-Reach Dreams

Jeremy Bloom, an Olympic freestyle skier and former National Football League player, has started a charity to grant wishes to low-income older people, The New York Times reports.

Since last fall Mr. Bloom’s Wish of a Lifetime charity, in Denver, has granted six requests and will announce 10 more at a fund-raising event on Wednesday. The wishes have included a wheelchair car lift so an elderly brain-injury victim could travel again and a 75-year-old woman’s date with a “hot young man” – in this case the 27-year-old Mr. Bloom.

The charity works with organizations that aid the elderly to find worthy recipients.

(Free registration is required to view this article.)